Do Safety Features in AI Companions Actually Work? A 2026 Reality Check
By 2026, “AI companion safety” is no longer a nice-to-have. U.S. state laws, EU compliance pressure, and high-profile litigation have […]
By 2026, “AI companion safety” is no longer a nice-to-have. U.S. state laws, EU compliance pressure, and high-profile litigation have […]
AI companions are often marketed as empathetic, always available, and emotionally supportive. But between 2024 and 2026, multiple documented cases
Short answer: no. By 2026, regulators, courts, and policymakers increasingly agree that AI companions cannot be governed using the same
AI Companions and the Surveillance of Intimacy (2026) This article is a supporting post to the pillar analysis: 👉 Are
This article is a supporting deep-dive for our pillar page: Are AI Companions Safe? Risks, Psychology, and Regulation (2026) →
This article is a supporting analysis for the pillar post: 👉 Are AI Companions Safe? Risks, Psychology, and Regulation (2026)
If you’re building an AI companion—or anything adjacent to it—the core risk in 2026 is no longer “PR backlash” or
Why AI Companions Are Addictive by Design Behavioral Mechanics, Dark Patterns, and the Regulatory Backlash (2026) This article is a
AI companions are no longer a niche curiosity. By 2026, platforms like Character.AI, Replika, and Nomi report tens of millions
AI companions are no longer “assistants.” In 2026, they’re increasingly relationship-shaped systems—always-on, emotionally validating, and memory-driven. That’s why a core